THEY IGNORE ARMED ATTACK ON NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION? WHY?

Cover the nuclear power generations immediately . Or move to underground. Or abolishes.

Are you going to lose on purpose?

Why do the nuclear power generation suits point out only the risk of natural disaster.

A purpose of the nuclear power generation suit is not to inspect whether a nuclear power plant can tolerate an earthquake and a tsunami and a volcano, natural disaster


Not many people pointing out the risk of nuclear power generation terrorism or armed attack.

　Councilor Taro Yamamoto took a question in the House of Councilors on July 29, 2015 and asked what happen when it was done a missile strike by Kawauchi Nuclear Power Plant.

Government statement

They know that North Korea holds 100 missiles, developed the nucleus. They have sense of impending crisis for a missile strike.

However. They do not assume the large-scale attack to nuclear power generation

Nobody reacted to this statement.

Normalcy bias ?

Armed attack happens for nuclear power generation.

It is very likely with the current international situation.

The human race may perish from the earth if it happen.

However, neither the media nor the person having you around me makes this a topic.

Even as for the person working on anti-nuclear power generation.



What percentage is the probability that some nuclear power plant is struck by force of arms within several years?

Is the risk lower than a giant earthquake?


Only thing I can do is that continue pointing it out